KDM12 — Missing definitions for ‘Engineering view’, ‘logical view’ and ‘developers view’ (rh-11)

Related to 11.1

"Engineering view", logical view" and "developers view" should be defined

Views should have definitions USUALLY as viewpoints

Remove references to these “views” (they are actually viewpoints, according to ISO 42010), since
each KDM model explicitly defines an architecture viewpoint.
Engineering view:
Editorial changes are provided as part of the resolution to issue 13296
Logical view:
Editorial changes are provided as part of the resolution to issue 13296
Developers view:
Change sentence Page 113, Ignore the generated primary code, provide a high-fidelity representation to
the embedded construct; the embedded construct is the origin and the target of KDM relationships; some
details of how the embedded construct is expanded into the primary code may not be recovered from the
KDM representation (but in general, the embedded construct provides a better representation, since it is the
view that developers have).
Into
Ignore the generated primary code, provide a high-fidelity representation to the
embedded construct; the embedded construct is the origin and the target of KDM
relationships; some details of how the embedded construct is expanded into the primary
code may not be recovered from the KDM instance (but in general, the embedded
construct provides a better choice, since it is the constructs introduced by the developer).