-
Key: I2JAV11-147
-
Legacy Issue Number: 5694
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Are both of these correct?
[It seems like the Java maps
"sequence <ServiceDetailType> service_details" instead of "sequence <ServiceDetail> service_details"]from formal/02-06-33 "CORBA 3.0 full specification
{ ServiceDetailType service_detail_type; sequence <octet> service_detail; }
typedef unsigned long ServiceOption;
typedef unsigned long ServiceDetailType;
struct ServiceDetail;
{ sequence <ServiceOption> service_options; sequence <ServiceDetail> service_details; }
struct ServiceInformation;
from ptc/02-09-09 "Revision of the interim Java RTF Java .zip archive
package org.omg.CORBA;
public final class ServiceInformation implements
org.omg.CORBA.portable.IDLEntity {public int[] service_options;
public int[] service_details;public ServiceInformation() {
}public ServiceInformation (int[] service_options, int[] service_details)
{ this.service_options = service_options; this.service_details = service_details; }}
-
Reported: I2JAV 1.0 — Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — I2JAV 1.1
-
Disposition Summary:
Incorporate changes and close issue
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:40 GMT
I2JAV11 — What is the IDL for ServiceInformation and/or what is correct Java mapping?
- Key: I2JAV11-147
- OMG Task Force: IDL to Java December 2000 RTF