FIBO Foundations 1.0 FTF — Open Issues - OMG Issue Tracker

Key: FIBOFTF-126

Status: closed

Source: Thematix Partners LLC ( Mrs. Elisa F. Kendall)

Summary:

During discussion on 7/15/2014 of the definitions included in the Contracts ontology, it was determined that for the cases that we care about in Foundations, BilateralContract is overly constrained. The consensus was to rename BilateralContract to MultilateralContract, revise the definition accordingly, and delete the restriction that there should be exactly 2 parties to the contract.

Reported: EDMC-FIBO/FND 1.0b2 — Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:18 GMT

Disposition: Resolved — EDMC-FIBO/FND 1.0b2

Disposition Summary:

BilateralContract is too limiting – rename to MultilateralContract

During discussion on 7/15/2014 of the definitions included in the Contracts ontology, it was determined that for the cases that we care about in Foundations, BilateralContract is overly constrained. The consensus was to rename BilateralContract to MultilateralContract, revise the definition accordingly, and delete the restriction that there should be exactly 2 parties to the contract.

Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT

Attachments:

Contract Types.png 81 kB (image/png)
JIRA126TableChanges.docx 14 kB (application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)