DPP 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

DPP — total separation of the DP<_Implied_IDL> and PB

  • Key: DPP-4
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5650
  • Status: open  
  • Source: Mercury Systems ( Jim Kulp)
  • Summary:

    The author of a parallel object implementation writes the
    implementation of part objects and specifies their ParallelBehavior.

    // I don't know if I'm sounding right, but there seems to be a total
    separation of the DP<_Implied_IDL> and PB. Is this intentional? Can a
    PB have ParallelOperations from multiple Parallel Objects (The part
    implementor may not do such a thing but from the spec it appears legal
    to do this). Won't that 'destroy' the implied semantics between a
    parallel object and it's parts?

  • Reported: DPP 1.0b1 — Thu, 26 Sep 2002 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 05:03 GMT