
Key: DMN1166

Status: closed

Source: Oracle ( Gary Hallmark)

Summary:
The notion of a 'type' or ItemDefinition is in the metamodel (with some pending issues) and in the semantics and concepts, but little is in the notation. Thus, we have notation that allows you to execute an expression with actual arguments, but no notation to allow validation based on type information without actual values.
We have most of the pieces, so it should not be difficult. E.g., individual values can be number, string, date and time, etc. We can allow numeric ranges using our unary tests, e.g. '>0', '[10..30)', etc. We can allow LOVs using "abc", "def", "ghi". These can be 'simple items', and we can also define structures using something similar to boxed contexts.

Reported: DMN 1.0 — Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:28 GMT

Disposition: Deferred — DMN 1.1

Disposition Summary:
carry over to 1.2
carry over to 1.2

Updated: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:07 GMT
DMN11 — No notation for ItemDefinition
 Key: DMN1166
 OMG Task Force: Decision Modeling and Notation 1.1 RTF