-
Key: DDS-142
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6849
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Real-Time Innovations ( Dr. Gerardo Pardo-Castellote, Ph.D.)
-
Summary:
Ref-161 Behavior_of_register_type
The specification does not say what happens if the application locally
tries to define the same "type_name" via register_typeThe case where a different DataType is being "registered" with a name
that was already used should clearly failThe case where the same DataType is registered again with the same
name could either fail or be idempotent.**PROPOSAL**
State in 2.1.2.3.6 that it is a pre-condition that the same name has
not already been used to register a different type. In case this is
attempted the register_type() operation shall return
PRECONDITION_ERRORState in 2.1.2.3.6 the documentation that it is OK to re-register the
same DataType again with the same type_name. In this case the
operation is idempotent and returns OK. -
Reported: DDS 1.0b1 — Tue, 23 Dec 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — DDS 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
see below
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
DDS — DDS ISSUE# 49] Behavior_of_register_type
- Key: DDS-142
- OMG Task Force: Data Distribution Service FTF