DDS — Ref-210 Clarification_of_responsibility_of_RxO_qos

In section 2.1.3 the explanation of the table mentions: "The QosPolicy
objects that need to be set in a compatible manner at the publisher
end are indicated by the setting of the RxO property" This suggests an
asymmetry between publishers and subscribers. It is not true that
compatibility of policy objects is entirely the responsibility of the
publisher, is it?

**PROPOSAL**

In said sentence replace "at the publisher end" with "between the
publisher and subscriber ends".

see below