-
Key: CORBA23-18
-
Legacy Issue Number: 2034
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: The current spec is not terribly clear on how recursive IDL types are
supposed to work.A minor problem here is that the terminating semicolon is missing following
the closing curly brace.But more seriously, it leaves it open whether, for example, the following
is legal:struct foo {
{ case 0: sequence<foo> foo_mem; case 1: char c_mem; }
union u switch (long)u_mem;
long l_mem;
}; -
Reported: CORBA 2.2 — Mon, 5 Oct 1998 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — CORBA 2.3
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT