CORBA22 — Ambiguity in non_existent() specification

Summary: There is a minor ambiguity here. Consider the case where the ORB cannot
make a reliable determination because the client-side run-time cannot
reach the implementation repository or the server. In that case, most
ORBs will raise a TRANSIENT or COMM_FAILURE exception. I can read the
above words in the spec to mean that a compliant implementation of
non_existent is allowed to hide the exception from me and return false
instead.
I suggest to amend the wording such that non_existent is obliged to propagate
any exception other than OBJECT_NOT_EXIST back to the caller.

Sugested text below , close issue