C2MS 1.2b1 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

C2MS12 — namespace support should be reflected in at least the telemetry and command related C2MS messages

  • Key: C2MS12-96
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: NASA ( Mr. James Kevin Rice)
  • Summary:

    Many t&c systems support some form of namespaces in their database definitions. For example a "parameter" might be associated with a certain namespace ("/myagency/mymission/mysystem/mysubsystem/batv1") or a command as well. XTCE supports a kind of namespace through the spacesystem tree. GSFC's ITOS supports namespaces in the database. (the other one, ASIST does not). And so forth.

  • Reported: C2MS 1.1b1 — Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:50 GMT
  • Disposition: Deferred — C2MS 1.2b1
  • Disposition Summary:

    Add optional namespace field and optional ns format field with default

    Ns is a string. Nsf is default "xtce" but also a string. Both optional. xtce means it's in xtce form /which/is/like/this.

    The default can accommodate other implementation specific forms but the xtce must be supported.

    The namespace should be associated with parameters, packets and commands.

    The following C2MS messages are affected:

    • Telemetry CCSDS Packet Message
    • Command Request Message
    • Command Response Message (maybe)
    • Command Echo Message
    • Replay Telemetry Data Messages
    • Telemetry Processed Frame Message
    • Telemetry TDM Frame Message
    • Replay Telemetry Data Request Message
    • Replay Telemetry Data Response Message
    • Mnemonic Value Request Message
    • Mnemonic Value Response
    • Mnemonic Value Data Message
    • Archive Mnemonic Value
    • Archive Mnemonic Value Response Message
    • Archive Mnemonic Value Data Message
  • Updated: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:00 GMT