BPMN 2.1 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

BPMN21 — sub-clause references incorrect

  • Key: BPMN21-445
  • Status: open  
  • Source: Edwards Vacuum LLC ( Jeff Guertin)
  • Summary:

    The sub-clauses listed in section 2.1 appear to be incorrect. References in the passage below to sub clause 2.1 should be referencing sub clause 2.2. The reference to sub clause 2.2 should be for sub clause 2.3. The reference to sub clause 2.3 should be for sub clause 2.4. Finally, the reference to subclause 2.4 should be for sub clause 2.5.

    Original passage:
    The implementation claiming conformance to the Process Modeling Conformance type SHALL comply with all of the
    requirements set forth in sub clause 2.1. The implementation claiming conformance to the Process Execution
    Conformance type SHALL comply with all of the requirements set forth in sub clause 2.2. The implementation claiming
    conformance to the BPEL Process Execution Semantics Conformance type SHALL comply with all of the
    requirements set forth in sub clause 2.3. The implementation claiming conformance to the Choreography Conformance
    type SHALL comply with all of the requirements set forth in sub clause 2.4. The implementation is said to have BPMN
    Complete Conformance if it complies with all of the requirements stated in sub clauses 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4.

  • Reported: BPMN 2.0.2 — Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:06 GMT
  • Updated: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:40 GMT