Source: oose Innovative Informatik eG ( Axel Scheithauer)
The specification says about External Relationships:
These extensions’ intention is to extend the semantics of a given BPMN Artifact.
The following text then refers consistently to BPMN Artifacts.
The metamodel however specifies that a Relationship links all kinds of CMOF::Elements, not just BPMN::Artifacts.
My guess is, that "BPMN Artifacts" was meant to read "BPMN elements", e.g.
typed relationships that enable BPMN and non-BPMN Artifacts to be related
should probably read
typed relationships that enable BPMN and non-BPMN
Artifactsto be related
Reported: BPMN 2.0.2 — Thu, 31 May 2018 12:33 GMT
Updated: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:11 GMT