BMM 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

BMMF2 — Associations between Assessments

  • Key: BMMF2-16
  • Legacy Issue Number: 11280
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Rule ML Initiative ( John Hall)
  • Summary:

    This suggestion came from Xactium, which has implemented BMM in its BMS product and has been providing feedback over the past couple of months.
    It would be useful to have a many-to-many association between Assessments. This would support explicit indication of which earlier assessments were considered important when making a given assessment. It would be useful in several contexts, including:
    · Decision support for making new assessments - identifying the full set of concerns taken into account in earlier assessments
    · Compliance audit - justifying decisions made in reacting to change
    Resolution:
    Add the association illustrated below to the MOF model and the model fragment in section 8:
    Note: I have used the CamelCase style for names proposed in the resolution of issue 10090.
    Include a description of this as a general association between assessments in section 8.
    Add the corresponding fact type and roles to section 9.
    Revised Text:
    In [section no] on page [9999], xxxx …

  • Reported: BMM 1.0b2 — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — BMM 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Add an "assessment uses assessment" association UML/MOF model.
    Include a description of this as a general association between assessments in section 8.
    Add the corresponding fact type and roles to section 9.

  • Updated: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:53 GMT