-
Key: BMMF2-16
-
Legacy Issue Number: 11280
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Rule ML Initiative ( John Hall)
-
Summary:
This suggestion came from Xactium, which has implemented BMM in its BMS product and has been providing feedback over the past couple of months.
It would be useful to have a many-to-many association between Assessments. This would support explicit indication of which earlier assessments were considered important when making a given assessment. It would be useful in several contexts, including:
· Decision support for making new assessments - identifying the full set of concerns taken into account in earlier assessments
· Compliance audit - justifying decisions made in reacting to change
Resolution:
Add the association illustrated below to the MOF model and the model fragment in section 8:
Note: I have used the CamelCase style for names proposed in the resolution of issue 10090.
Include a description of this as a general association between assessments in section 8.
Add the corresponding fact type and roles to section 9.
Revised Text:
In [section no] on page [9999], xxxx -
Reported: BMM 1.0b2 — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — BMM 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
Add an "assessment uses assessment" association UML/MOF model.
Include a description of this as a general association between assessments in section 8.
Add the corresponding fact type and roles to section 9. -
Updated: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:53 GMT