BMMF2 — definition of 'influencer' needs to be changed

There is still an issue with the definition of External Influencer which is "outside an enterprise's organizational boundaries" not only outside one department organizational boundary. In the provided example, the "Human Resources Policy Group" is still "inside the enterprise's organizational boundaries"

My understanding is that a directive can act as regulation, which means that regulation is not always a subtype of "external influencer".

I agree with your next issue: there is a need for a clarification between regulation and regulation authority (or regulator)

Create an association organization unit acts as influencing organization, to support organization units acting as the source of influencers.
One use of this association is: when a directive from one part of an enterprise has to be treated as a regulation in other parts of the enterprise, the source department can be referenced.
This builds on the resolution of Issue 10093, but can be voted on separately - i.e. 10093 might be accepted and this one rejected.
But the solution proposed here cannot be used if the proposal for 10093 is rejected