${taskforce.name} Avatar
  1. OMG Task Force

Online Upgrades FTF — All Issues

  • Key: ONUP
  • Issues Count: 2
Create Issue
Open Closed All
All Issues

Issues Summary

Key Issue Reported Fixed Disposition Status
ONUP-1 Conformance Points appear to be contradictory ONUP 1.0b1 ONUP 1.0 Resolved closed
ONUP-2 multiplicities in class diagram on page 2-18 advisory or normative ? ONUP 1.0b1 ONUP 1.0 Resolved closed

Issues Descriptions

Conformance Points appear to be contradictory

  • Key: ONUP-1
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5446
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: 2AB ( Carol Burt)
  • Summary:

    Section 8.1 on Mandatory and Optional Interfaces, and Section 8.2 on
    Conformance Points appear to be contradictory - you should define what you
    mean by "the entire set of specifications" as a conformance point. I'm
    not sure what it means to say that you have to implement the entire
    specification when some interfaces are "optional". i would take this to
    mean that a "conformant" implementation might be required to implement
    optional interfaces and throw "NO_IMPLEMENT" on every operation on those
    interfaces. This should be clarified
  • Reported: ONUP 1.0b1 — Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — ONUP 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    See below
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 23:14 GMT

multiplicities in class diagram on page 2-18 advisory or normative ?

  • Key: ONUP-2
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5447
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: David Frankel Consulting ( David Frankel)
  • Summary:

    Issue for the Online Upgrades FTF, referencing document mars/02-03-02: The specification should clarify whether the multiplicities in the class diagram on page 2-18 are advisory or normative
  • Reported: ONUP 1.0b1 — Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — ONUP 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    See below.
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 23:14 GMT