Summary: At the beginning of section 2.2, brief IDL description of WorkflowModel
module are described. In the description, "#include <TimeBase.idl>" is
expected compared with consolidated IDL. Is it dropped or not mentioned by
purpose?
Same things at section 2.15. Followings are expected.
#include <orb.idl>
#include <CosNotification.idl>
#include <CosTransactions.idl>
#include <CosLifeCycle.idl>
#include <ObjectIdentity.idl>

Fix IDL. In accordance with issue 2066 resolution.

Summary: In section 2.8.2 set_assignee() raises InvalidResource exception, and there
is an explanation about the exception, but it is not defined in section
2.8.1 and consolidated IDL.
In section 2.6.1 and 2.6.3, set_requester() raises CannotCha$B#n(BgeRequester
exception, but there is no explanation about the exception and it is not
defined in consolidated IDL.

Should these two exceptions be deleted or not?

Add missing IDL statements.

Summary: In section 2.4.5 and 3.4.1(consolidated IDL) exceptions regarding
ExecutionObject are defined but there are mismatches between them.

Operation |exceptions described in 2.4.5 |exceptions described in 3.4.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
resume() |CannotResume, NotSuspended |CannotResume
suspend() |CannotSuspend, NotRunning |CannotSuspend,AlreadySuspended
terminate() |CannotStop, NotRunning | <----
abort() |CannotStop, NotRunning | <----
(cf. WfBase::BaseException is omitted)

What are the correct description?

Fix the inconsistencies.

Summary: Resolution:

Fix the IDL where it is different from section 2.4.4