ZIOP 1.0 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

ZIOP — Japan CORBA Part 1 PAS Ballot Comments - comment 19

Open Closed All
  • Key: ZIOP-32
  • Legacy Issue Number: 14382
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Fujitsu ( Tom Rutt)
  • Summary:

    Summary:
    Location:
    All Clauses
    Comment:
    ISO standard documents are described with "shall", "should" and "may".
    Proposed Change
    Define this with "shall", "should" and "may"
  • Reported: ZIOP 1.0b1 — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — ZIOP 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Change the title of clause 4 to the following:
    “
    4 Additional information
    “
    Add a new sub section header at beginning of clause 4:
    “
    4.1 Outline of specification contents
    “
    Add new subsection to end of section 4:
    “
    4.2 Keywords for Requirement statements”
    The keywords "must", "must not", "shall", "shall not", "should", "should not", and "may” in this
    specification are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119].“
    “
    Add the following reference in the normative references - section 3.2:
    [RFC2119] IETF RFC2119, “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels”, S. Bradner,
    March 1997. Available from http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT