-
Key: XTCE12-189
-
Legacy Issue Number: 9039
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Source: Michael Staub michael.staub@dlr.de
Description : Is command parameter processing intentionally left out? On the other hand, TM
calibration is mentioned. The same is valid for command packetization.
Resolution: but for command arguments
Title: GV-007 Dependencies or aggregation
Source: Gert Villemos gev@terma.com
Description : The UML diagrams seems to use dependencies (arrow) instead of aggregation (line
with diamond). From the context, aggregation is meant. It is not clear whether the
UML diagrams are intended only to illustrate the definition or actually be formal
Resolution: Notation was decided by the tool that was used to do reverse engineering (from
XML Schema to UML). It is agreed that the suggested representation is more
correct.ACTION GV-007-01: Gert Villemos to provide updated UML diagrams for XTCE.
Due 30May05 -
Reported: XTCE 1.0 — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Closed; No Change — XTCE 1.2
-
Disposition Summary:
Corrected in XTCE version 1.1
No change dispositions from original poll 2.
-
Updated: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:22 GMT
XTCE12 — MS-009 De-calibration of cmd parameters?
- Key: XTCE12-189
- OMG Task Force: XML Telemetric & Command Exchange Format 1.2 (XTCE) RTF