XTCE 1.2 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

XTCE12 — MS-009 De-calibration of cmd parameters?

  • Key: XTCE12-189
  • Legacy Issue Number: 9039
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Source: Michael Staub michael.staub@dlr.de
    Description : Is command parameter processing intentionally left out? On the other hand, TM
    calibration is mentioned. The same is valid for command packetization.
    Resolution: but for command arguments
    Title: GV-007 Dependencies or aggregation
    Source: Gert Villemos gev@terma.com
    Description : The UML diagrams seems to use dependencies (arrow) instead of aggregation (line
    with diamond). From the context, aggregation is meant. It is not clear whether the
    UML diagrams are intended only to illustrate the definition or actually be formal
    Resolution: Notation was decided by the tool that was used to do reverse engineering (from
    XML Schema to UML). It is agreed that the suggested representation is more
    correct.

    ACTION GV-007-01: Gert Villemos to provide updated UML diagrams for XTCE.
    Due 30May05

  • Reported: XTCE 1.0 — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Closed; No Change — XTCE 1.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    Corrected in XTCE version 1.1

    No change dispositions from original poll 2.

  • Updated: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:22 GMT