XTCE 1.2 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

XTCE12 — Put Alarms in Arguments; leaves Alarms in Command Parameters

  • Key: XTCE12-126
  • Legacy Issue Number: 14461
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: NASA ( Mr. James Kevin Rice)
  • Summary:

    Description Kevin Rice 2007-10-22 21:17:55 BST
    Command Argument should have alarms; I have found one user that claims alarms
    on USER INPUT arguments. Therefore I believe we should generalize the schema
    to having them both in parameters and arguments. In the end I believe we'll be
    making arguments and parameters look exactly the same even if the nomenclature
    stays separate.
    Comment 1 Kevin Rice 2007-10-22 21:20:06 BST
    Command Argument should have alarms; I have found one user that claims alarms
    on USER INPUT arguments. Therefore I believe we should generalize the schema
    to having them both in parameters and arguments. In the end I believe we'll be
    making arguments and parameters look exactly the same even if the nomenclature
    stays separate.

  • Reported: XTCE 1.1 — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Closed; No Change — XTCE 1.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    Not essential to definition exchange

    Command arguments are typically associated with operator entry of a command request, or a scripted command request. XTCE Command argument definitions may include a valid range which would define for the ground system the invalid range to reject at command request time. This rejection is not the same as a valid alarm, and the action that the ground system takes when it receives an invalid argument value is system-dependent, but should result in the rejection of the command request.

  • Updated: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:22 GMT