-
Key: UMLTP2-11
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS ( Mr. Marc-Florian Wendland)
-
Summary:
UTP should better distinguish the origin of the terms in the vocabulary. E.g., there are concepts and definitions, which are solely listed in the conceptual model or the profile implementation vice versa. The UTP vocabulary should indicate where this term originated from.
A potential solution is to add a introductory sentence to section 4 to explain that the terms in section 4 are a summary of the conceptual model of UTP 2 (section 7). Furthermore, improve section 6.2 (Typographical Conventions) with respect to the kids of cross references in the spec (to the definition, to the conceptual model to stereotypes)
-
Reported: UTP 2.0b1 — Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:46 GMT
-
Disposition: Duplicate or Merged — UTP2 2.0
-
Disposition Summary:
Clarify the nature of Clause 4
This issue will be merged with the issue #6 and resolved in the course of the resolution of issue #6 with is done with the proposal #47.
-
Updated: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:16 GMT