UMLR — Suggestion for improved wording of description for attribute "isDisjoint"

In the section GeneralizationSet, section 9.9.8.4 "Attributes" on page 181, in the description for attribute "isDisjoint" the word "members" should be replaced by "elements" to avoid confusion with Classifier members. And, after all, sets have elements, not members.

The original text reads:

isDisjoint: Boolean [1..1] = false
Indicates whether or not the set of specific Classifiers in a Generalization relationship have instance in
common. If isDisjoint is true, the specific Classifiers for a particular GeneralizationSet have no members in
common; that is, their intersection is empty. If isDisjoint is false, the specific Classifiers in a particular
GeneralizationSet have one or more members in common; that is, their intersection is not empty.

Suggested improvement:

isDisjoint: Boolean [1..1] = false
Indicates whether or not the set of specific Classifiers in a Generalization relationship have any elements in
common. If isDisjoint is true, the specific Classifiers for a particular GeneralizationSet have no elements in
common; that is, their intersection is empty. If isDisjoint is false, the specific Classifiers in a particular
GeneralizationSet have one or more elements in common; that is, their intersection is not empty.

This seems to be more in agreement with what the summary text on page 162 under 9.7.3 "Semantics" is saying.