UMLR — Unclear wording about Stereotypes and ownership of their Properties

On page 301-302 under section 12.3.3.4 Stereotypes, there is this sentence on p. 302:

"The type of a composite aggregation Stereotype Property cannot be a Stereotype (since Stereotypes are owned by their Extensions) or a metaclass (since instances of metaclasses are owned by other instances of metaclasses)..."

I believe that this wording can be improved. A Stereotype must be owned by a Profile, either directly or indirectly through a Package owned by a Profile. This is stated on p. 322 in section 12.4.9.5 "Operations" of Stereotypes under the description of the "profile()" operation.

To avoid confusion, the first quoted sentence could be worded like this:

"The type of a composite aggregation Stereotype Property cannot be a Stereotype (since Stereotype *Properties* are owned by their Extensions)..."

or perhaps better like this:

"The type of a composite aggregation Stereotype Property cannot be a Stereotype (since Stereotype *instances* are owned by their Extensions)..."

The ownership of instances of a Stereotype is defined in the last bulleted list item under section 12.3.3.1.3 "MOF-Equivalent Semantics" on p. 297-298 says: "An instance of a Stereotype (...) maps to an instance of the CMOF class representing the Stereotype. This stereotype instance is compositionally associated with the Element to which it applies using a Link that is an instance of the composite Association to which the Extension is mapped."

I assume that this was the intended meaning?