-
Key: UMLR-78
-
Legacy Issue Number: 9339
-
Status: open
-
Source: Adaptive ( Mr. Pete Rivett)
-
Summary:
Given that these are both
{ordered}, indicating that ordering is important, then it seems only sensible that the ordering should be consistent, i.e. if Property p appears before Property q in memberEnd then that should also be the case for ownedEnd.
There should therefore be a constraint added to this effect.There should probably also be a review of other cases where an ordered Property subsets another ordered property.
Or should there be a more general constraint defined at the meta-level? -
Reported: UML 2.5 — Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT
UMLR — consistent ordering of Association::memberEnd and ownedEnd
- Key: UMLR-78
- OMG Task Force: UML 2.6 RTF