Source: Change Vision ( Michael Chonoles)
7This is a complaint about the fact the complete and covering are synonyms. and are clearly defined as synonyms
isCovering is used in the metamodel in 9.7.2/9.7.3
However, in table 9.1 the notational term is Complete/incomplete.
Having the synonyms only adds confusion and lowers the professionalism of the spec. If a user modeled a generalization as IsCovering=True, would that be wrong?
This will be confusing to students taking the UML Certification exams.
An earlier version of this issue was closed with no discussion.
Reported: UML 2.5 — Fri, 29 May 2015 04:08 GMT
Updated: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:48 GMT