-
Key: UMLR-266
-
Legacy Issue Number: 16897
-
Status: open
-
Source: Fraunhofer FOKUS ( Mr. Marc-Florian Wendland)
-
Summary:
In many cases, modeler would like to specify the mapping of an Abstraction on an informal level by just providing a LiteralString or OpaqueExpression describing the mapping in a natural language.
The necessity to use an Expression is for this kind of usage of this feature cumbersome and clunky.
The resolution could be to use a more common metaclass of Expression, i.e. ValueSpecification, to provide the highest level of flexibility to the modeler, how mappings can be specified.
-
Reported: UML 2.4 — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT
UMLR — Abstraction::mapping should be of type ValueSpecification or OpaqueExpression
- Key: UMLR-266
- OMG Task Force: UML 2.6 RTF