-
Key: UMLR-245
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15890
-
Status: open
-
Source: Airbus Group ( Mr. Yves Bernard)
-
Summary:
According to several discussions I had with UML users, it appears that many of them, who have the intent to simply to add an attribute to a class, finally create an association to the type of the required attribute. In all case I faced, the reason was that they prefer the notation UML proposes for association which is much more powerful. Mainly:
Capability to get a modular diagram thanks to the “link notation”
Capability to show the aggregation kindHowever attributes and association are not the same and it is a pity to introduce such a drift in the semantics just because of the notation.
What do you think about adding a notation for the attributes that would offer the capability to represent all their properties and to designate their type using a link?
-
Reported: UML 2.5 — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT