-
Key: UMLR-175
-
Legacy Issue Number: 14044
-
Status: open
-
Source: Oracle ( Dave Hawkins)
-
Summary:
Should there be a constraint for extends equivalent to 16.3.6 [4], that extends should be an acylic relationship between use cases?
-
Reported: UML 2.2 — Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT
UMLR — Should there be a constraint for extends equivalent to 16.3.6 [4]
- Key: UMLR-175
- OMG Task Force: UML 2.6 RTF