UML 2.5 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

UML25 — Profiles in Compliance Level 1?

Open Closed All
  • Key: UML25-586
  • Legacy Issue Number: 7627
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Simula Research Laboratory ( Dr. Bran Selic)
  • Summary:

    It has been suggested that Profiles should be part of Compliance Level 1 (Basic Level) rather than part of Compliance Level 2 (Intermediate Level) as currently defined. The rationale is that it gives any UML user the ability to specialize UML. We already know from experience that UML is almost ALWAYS specialized when it is used – implicitly or explicitly. Given that, we might as well provide users at all levels with the ability to use profiles. I feel that this is a reasonable suggestion.

  • Reported: UML 1.4.2 — Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.5
  • Disposition Summary:

    Discussion
    This issue has already been resolved by, or no longer applies to, the UML 2.5 Beta 1 specification.
    Disposition: Closed - No Change
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT