-
Key: UML24-50
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15167
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Dassault Systemes ( Mr. Nerijus Jankevicius)
-
Summary:
Are composite tag definitions allowed?
-
Reported: UML 2.3 — Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.4
-
Disposition Summary:
A Stereotype is a kind of Class and the semantics of a Property defined on a Stereotype is the same as
that of a Property defined on a Class. Therefore, a Stereotype Property can have composite aggregation.
The value of a composite Stereotype Property will be owned by an instance of such Stereotype. The type
of such Property cannot be a Stereotype (since Stereotypes are owned by their Extensions) or a metaclass
(since instances of metaclasses are owned by other instantances of metaclasses); however, the type of such
Property can be a Class defined in the Profile or a DataType defined in the Profile or accessible via import
or via the Profile’s metamodel reference. -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT