-
Key: UML22-556
-
Legacy Issue Number: 7947
-
Status: closed
-
Source: oose Innovative Informatik eG ( Mr. Tim Weilkiens)
-
Summary:
I see a problem in the definition of the InstanceSpecification of a new primitive like Real. The value is specified by a ValueSpecification. The UML metamodel of ValueSpecifications reflects the predefined primitive types of UML: LiteralInteger, LiteralString, and so on. This is an indirect dependency from the Kernel package to the AuxiliaryConstructs package. That dependency direction shouldn't be allowed. How to specify a value specification for a primitive type Real? I think that we need LiteralReal to do that.
-
Reported: UML 1.4.2 — Wed, 24 Nov 2004 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.1
-
Disposition Summary:
See issue 8069 for disposition
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT