UML22 — The spec needs to clarify the isConsistentWith() method for transitions

In the 2.1.1 specification (070203) states on page 583/732 (or pg.569), it states:
[1] The query isConsistentWith() specifies that a redefining transition is consistent with a redefined transition provided that
the redefining transition has the following relation to the redefined transition: A redefining transition redefines all
properties of the corresponding redefined transition, except the source state and the trigger.

This restriction seems a little harsh. Consider the use case:
1) a user has a state machine, in a top level abstract class, and there exists a transition between two states with no triggers.
2) the users expect to add triggers to the transition in the concrete sub class state machines. (i.e. redefine in the sub class context and add a trigger)

The way the above constraint is written does not allow new triggers to be added to redefined transitions. I am requesting a clarification point that will state that new triggers can be added to the redefined transition.

Merged with 6395