-
Key: UML22-10
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6200
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Simula Research Laboratory ( Dr. Bran Selic)
-
Summary:
Redefinition, as used in UML2, sometimes violates superclass substituitability rules. For example, redefining multiplicity from many to 1 breaks some OCL constraints. For example, Statemachines changed a multiplicity from many to 1. Statemachines redefines association to OwnedBehaviors to OwnedStateMachines which does not allow other types of owned behaviors.
-
Reported: UML 1.5 — Sun, 7 Sep 2003 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.2
-
Disposition Summary:
Discussion
The specific issue with state machines no longer applies, having been resolved in an earlier RTF. The general
issue about redefinition is a complaint about a fundamental characteristic of UML semantics which are by
now quite well understood. Changing these semantics would be very fundamental and disruptive.
This also resolves issue 14929.
Disposition: Closed - No Change -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML22 — UML 2 Super/Metamodel/redefinition and substitutability
- Key: UML22-10
- OMG Task Force: UML 2.2 RTF