Legacy Issue Number: 1781
Summary: OCL should allow the use of "let" expressions (for the sake of
Note: The lack of a "let" feature is also mentioned in the abstract for
a paper on OCL at
along with a number of other issues:
"Specifically, the paper suggests that: the concept of flattening
collections of collections is unnecessary, state models should be
connectable to class models, defining object creation should be made more
convenient, OCL should be based on a 2-valued logic, set subtraction
should be covered more fully, and a "let" feature should be introduced."
Reported: UML 1.1 — Thu, 6 Aug 1998 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.2
Redundant with issue# 1689.
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:36 GMT