UML14 — Document 99-06-08 - UML Spec

I'd find the document easier to digest if Chap 2 had some pictures in it.
>>
>>I know that the semantics is supposed to be independent of the
>>representation. However, Chap 3 does contain some semantics in it for
>>explanitory purposes (eg: section 3.55.1), so it's not unreasonabnle for
>>Chap 2 to contain some notation. If section 2.5.4 (Association) had a
>>picture of the diamond shaped association end for aggregations, it would be
>>easier to follow what the document is talking about.
>>
>>At least sections 3.55.1 and 2.11.4 for instance might have links, even if
>>only footnotes, to connect actor notation and semantics.

No Data Available