Legacy Issue Number: 3632
I'd find the document easier to digest if Chap 2 had some pictures in it.
>>I know that the semantics is supposed to be independent of the
>>representation. However, Chap 3 does contain some semantics in it for
>>explanitory purposes (eg: section 3.55.1), so it's not unreasonabnle for
>>Chap 2 to contain some notation. If section 2.5.4 (Association) had a
>>picture of the diamond shaped association end for aggregations, it would be
>>easier to follow what the document is talking about.
>>At least sections 3.55.1 and 2.11.4 for instance might have links, even if
>>only footnotes, to connect actor notation and semantics.
Reported: UML 1.3 — Fri, 19 May 2000 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
No Data Available
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT