-
Key: UML14-46
-
Legacy Issue Number: 3569
-
Status: closed
-
Source: MotionPoint ( Eugenio Alvarez)
-
Summary:
Every StateMachine must have one top State. However, there is an
OCL constraint that says that the top State must be a CompositeState
(Semantics 2.12.3 Well-FormednessRules, StateMachine Section, rule [2], p
2-141). So, why not make the top relationship from StateMachine to
CompositeState instead of from StateMachine to State. The constraint can
then be eliminated. -
Reported: UML 1.3 — Tue, 18 Apr 2000 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML14 — Why is a StateMachine's top a State instead of a CompositeState?
- Key: UML14-46
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF