-
Key: UML14-456
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6678
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Simula Research Laboratory ( Dr. Bran Selic)
-
Summary:
Instead of subsetting ActivityEdge::inGroup with an ActivityEdge::interruptibleRegion property (as is done with ActivityNode), a completely new association (ActivityEdge::interruptibleRegion<->InterruptibleActivityRegion::interruptingEdge) is introduced. Why the inconsistency?
-
Reported: UML 1.5 — Thu, 4 Dec 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
see above
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML14 — UML 2 Super / Activities / inconsistency in representing subsetting
- Key: UML14-456
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF