-
Key: UML14-438
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6627
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Simula Research Laboratory ( Dr. Bran Selic)
-
Summary:
The third constraint on StructuralFeatureAction (page 258) uses the very non-existent feature "multiplicity" of the InputPin metaclass. Not only that, but because this "multiplicity" feature doesn't exist, who is to tell what kind of element it is that defines the "is(lower, upper)" operation! Recall that the InputPin is a specialization of ObjectNode, which is not a MultiplicityElement, but defines a single attribute "upper : ValueSpecification." Where is the corresponding "lower"?
-
Reported: UML 1.5 — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
This duplicates 6090.
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML14 — UML 2 Super/Actions/non-existent feature "multiplicity"
- Key: UML14-438
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF