UML 1.4 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

UML14 — Activity nodes and Stereotypes - UML2 Superstructure issue

Open Closed All
  • Key: UML14-425
  • Legacy Issue Number: 6519
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Pivot Point ( Cris Kobryn)
  • Summary:

    The new Profiles package and the respective Stereotypes still seem
    very
    "class-oriented" when it comes to notation (maybee my fault?).
    Specifically,
    I have the following doubt:

    If I want to define a Stereotype for an activity node, e.g. a
    ForkNode, is
    the notation in the attached file correct?
  • Reported: UML 1.5 — Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    No Data Available
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT