UML 1.4 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

UML14 — does "is not instantiable" imply "isAbstract"? - UML2 Superstructure

Open Closed All
  • Key: UML14-424
  • Legacy Issue Number: 6518
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Daimler AG ( Mario Jeckle)
  • Summary:

    Just a minor graphical typo: Page 487 of the superstructure document
    specifies an InformationItem as not instanciable. But the classifiers
    taxonomy provided at page E-565 of the same document depicts it as
    instanciable class.

    I guess it should be italicized.

    Or am I just misinterpreting the sentence "is not instanciable"? I
    guessed it implies "isAbstract == true".
  • Reported: UML 1.5 — Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    see above
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT