-
Key: UML14-422
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6516
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Daimler AG ( Mario Jeckle)
-
Summary:
Comparing figure 1-63 (Superstructure document page 92) with the text
placed above describing it and the presentation guidelines for
interface
relationships (i.e. the relationships connecting an interface with its
requiring and/or providing classes) it seems that the dashed lines
announced in the text are gone in the figure.Reading the text the arrow pointing from TheftAlarm to ISensor should
be
realized as a dependency relationship and also the arrow pointing from
ProximitySensor to ISensor. The latter is currently realized as a
generalization arrow which is solely a valid presentation option for
relationships connecting a Component and their Interface. According to
the spec the arrow should be a dependency relationship that is
stereotyped with realizes having ProximitySensor as client and Isensor
as supplier.Or am I just misreading the spec?
Any help and clarification appreciated -
Reported: UML 1.5 — Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
Resolved by the resolution to issue 6069
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML14 — Dependency notation for interfaces - UML2 Superstructure
- Key: UML14-422
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF