UML 1.4 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

UML14 — Dependency notation for interfaces - UML2 Superstructure

  • Key: UML14-422
  • Legacy Issue Number: 6516
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Daimler AG ( Mario Jeckle)
  • Summary:

    Comparing figure 1-63 (Superstructure document page 92) with the text
    placed above describing it and the presentation guidelines for
    interface
    relationships (i.e. the relationships connecting an interface with its
    requiring and/or providing classes) it seems that the dashed lines
    announced in the text are gone in the figure.

    Reading the text the arrow pointing from TheftAlarm to ISensor should
    be
    realized as a dependency relationship and also the arrow pointing from
    ProximitySensor to ISensor. The latter is currently realized as a
    generalization arrow which is solely a valid presentation option for
    relationships connecting a Component and their Interface. According to
    the spec the arrow should be a dependency relationship that is
    stereotyped with realizes having ProximitySensor as client and Isensor
    as supplier.

    Or am I just misreading the spec?
    Any help and clarification appreciated

  • Reported: UML 1.5 — Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    Resolved by the resolution to issue 6069

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT