-
Key: UML14-413
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6507
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Daimler AG ( Mario Jeckle)
-
Summary:
The current Superstructure document states that "Any association may
be
drawn as a diamond ...". This changes the behavior present in UML 1.x
significantly which only allowed the diamond for n-ary (n>2)
associations.As a consequence of this change a UML diagram may look more like an
Entity-Relationship model with some changes (placement of the
association's name, multiplicity notation, and all the semantics)
than a
upward compatible UML digram.Is this intended?
I tend to retain UML's former behavor to allow the large diamond only
for n-ary associations.Any ideas or am I just misreading the spec?
-
Reported: UML 1.5 — Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML14 — Binary associations decorated with large diamonds legal?
- Key: UML14-413
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF