-
Key: UML14-365
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6426
-
Status: closed
-
Source: David Frankel Consulting ( David Frankel)
-
Summary:
Issue: Re Chapter 2, Components, Figure 2-15, p. 118: The figure caption
says that the figure is an example of connector wiring, but the text
directly below the caption says that the figure "may be used as a notation
option for dependency based wiring." These two statements appear to be
contradictory.Recommendation: To avoid having an ambiguous notation, specify that
dependency notation should be used for dependency based wiring. (This
recommendation may be affected by the resolution of the issue submitted
about semantic distinctions between different ways to wire components
together). -
Reported: UML 1.5 — Tue, 4 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML14 — ad-03-04-01 Chap 2 p. 118 Figure 2-15/Components: Wiring notation
- Key: UML14-365
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF