-
Key: UML14-280
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6231
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Simula Research Laboratory ( Dr. Bran Selic)
-
Summary:
pg. 379: AnyTrigger: It is obviously illegal to have 2 anyTriggers in the same state (but the specification should say that, which it doesn't). What about multiple anyTriggers in nested states? The specification is silent on this point. It should probably be allowed with the most specific state taking precedence. This is a useful situation. Need to define it in any case.
-
Reported: UML 1.5 — Sun, 7 Sep 2003 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
see above
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT