-
Key: UML14-26
-
Legacy Issue Number: 2290
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: In UML versions 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 the class diagram for the Core Backbone
declares ElementOwnership as an AssociationClass. This appears to be a
violation of MOF compliance, since the MOF meta-meta-model does not support
the notion of an AssociationClass.Of course one could extrapolate AssociationClass from the MOF
meta-meta-model since it does support both Association and Class, and one
could also logically extrapolate a MOF-IDL and MOF-XML mapping for an
extrapolated MOF AssociationClass. However, two architects might
extrapolate these mappings in perfectly valid but different manners, since
there is no standard mapping for a MOF AssociationClass. Apparently such
an extrapolation has been performed in order to derive the IDL for the UML
meta-model that concerns ElementOwnership, but doing this without a
standard mapping seems dangerous. -
Reported: XMI 1.0 — Tue, 5 Jan 1999 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT