-
Key: UML14-136
-
Legacy Issue Number: 5980
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Google ( Don Baisley)
-
Summary:
The description of GeneralizationSet uses the words "general" and
"specific" to mean "specific" and "general" respectively. The description
also uses unclear terms like "maps to classifier" without identifying which
association. Also, the semantics has: "All of the Generalization links that
share a given general Classifier are divided into disjoint sets (that is,
partitions) using the generalizationSet association." This statement is
nonsense. First, the metamodel does not require all generalizations to be
put into partitions using "the generalizationSet association". Second,
partitions are not required by the metamodel to be disjoint - the same
generalization can be in multiple generalization sets (as should be the
case). -
Reported: UML 1.5 — Thu, 19 Jun 2003 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.4.2
-
Disposition Summary:
see above, resolved
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT