UML14 — Section 3.90.2.2

Section 3.90.2.2 says

"In other words when a state prodices an outpout that is input to the
subsequent state, that object flow relationship implies a control
constraint."

I take it that this is not the same as isSynch being true? That is isSynch
means that an object in an object flow is rather like a token in a Petri
net. ie once it flows out to the consuming state, its gone from its place.
Is that correct?

No Data Available