-
Key: UML14-1001
-
Legacy Issue Number: 3292
-
Status: closed
-
Source: NIST ( Mr. Conrad Bock)
-
Summary:
Figure 3-56, p 117 of the collaboration notation, it intended to
give an example of constraining elements, but it shows
generalization relationships between roles instead. I thought
the constraining elements would refer to the base classifiers and
associations, not the roles. Using generalization links between
roles has a different semantics than between the base classifiers
(see Semantics of Collaboration 2, above). -
Reported: UML 1.2 — Sat, 5 Feb 2000 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 1.3
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:37 GMT
UML14 — Incorrect example of constraining elements in collaborations.
- Key: UML14-1001
- OMG Task Force: UML 1.4 RTF