TRANS 1.3 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

TRANS13 — Synchronization issue?

  • Key: TRANS13-15
  • Legacy Issue Number: 2349
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Summary: Synchronizations which are registered with a top-level transaction are
    only informed when the transaction commits (at the start and end of the
    2-phase protocol). The intention is that they can then make any
    transient data available to the appropriate resource. Is there not a
    requirement (or wouldn"t it be a good idea anyway) that they should be
    informed if the transaction simply rolls back (i.e., rollback is called
    on the Coordinator rather than commit), so that they can remove
    transient data, do garbage collection etc?

  • Reported: TRANS 1.1 — Wed, 27 Jan 1999 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — TRANS 1.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    The resolution for this issue is to change the OTS specification so that it is clear that only the a

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 21:36 GMT