TEX 1.1 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

TEX11 — DDS Mapping for schema of extended data is unclear

  • Key: TEX11-4
  • Status: closed   Implementation work Blocked
  • Source: BAE SYSTEMS ( Mr. Simon Mettrick)
  • Summary:

    The DDS IDL for the schema of extended data is
    "ExtendedData__id_type _id;"
    This is missing the name, missing description and is an inappropriate underlying type - int. It would be natural to refer to a schema through a schema prefix.

  • Reported: TEX 1.0 — Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:38 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — $issue.fixedSpecification.name
  • Disposition Summary:

    Schema to be reference object itself that can be included by-value

    Change the association to the ExtensionSchema class in the PIM to be a composition.
    Also make it mandatory (note that the name of the Schema could be empty if used without a formal schema).
    Also schema should be the name of the target role not of the relation.

  • Updated: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 19:40 GMT
  • Attachments: