SYSML2_ — Representative notation example for allocation confusing/wrong?

Table 13 shows an example of a composite allocation. Part allocation owns an allocation between performed actions.
The graphical notation shows an allocation edge between perform edges, owned by an allocation edge between parts.
It is for sure confusing, and not sure if the textual notation that says

 allocate part1.action1 to part2.action2; 

is correct, provided that action1 and action2 are performed but not owned actions.
Even if technically correct, it would be better to present a clearer and simpler example of composite allocations.

Defer to RTF

This issue was submitted after the end of the comment period, and the FTF has decided to defer its consideration to a future RTF.